2015 Blindspot series: Patton (1970)






A WW2 epic which won 7 Oscars. The opening is what the film is best remembered for, with General Patton walking onto a stage with a huge American flag behind him, delivering a quotable speech to the (hidden) soldiers in the audience. At this early point, it’s already clear Patton is passionate about making a difference in World War II, and wants to empower others to do their best. We are made to feel like we are the soldiers he is addressing, which adds to the power of the scene.

George C Scott gives an Oscar worthy performance as General George S. Patton Jr, he spreads fear wherever he goes, among his group of soldiers, and as a tactician in the battle with the Germans. The film follows Patton during his North African and European campaigns from 1943-1945, celebrating the army as a war machine, yet justifying controversial independent thinking. We witness realistic battle scenes in Tunisia and Sicily. Apparently the film is fairly accurate as to what really happened.

General Patton perceives himself as a poet, war historian, and reincarnated soldier and is man essentially born in the wrong century. Patton says he’s nothing and “in the dog house“ if he’s not part of the war effort. He lives for the excitement of war. Unfortunately he also has a big mouth and has an old-fashioned tendency to strike out at shell shocked soldiers who he considers cowards, which gets Patton into trouble with his superiors. Yet you could also look at his instilling discipline as motivating the soldiers to rise above their condition. At times, Patton cares more about personal glory than the fate of his soldiers, which causes friction. In a memorable supporting role, Karl Malden plays Patton’s second-hand man, he is both a friend and an advisor. The story is not only told from the allied side, the Germans are also attempting to get one step ahead and figure out Patton’s strategy, so part of the film is subtitled.

I will say the film is a little overlong and while George C Scott does his best with the material he’s given, the screenplay is slightly heavy-handed in some places, spelling out Patton’s strengths and weaknesses. Even so, I like that the filmmakers don’t simply praise Patton as a war hero, which a lesser war film might have done.
Questions what is right and wrong for those in high ranks during a war. Should you push your men to the extreme in order to gain an advantage over the enemy, or is the well-being and survival of the soldiers most important? Many would agree with the latter, yet if it’s the difference between winning or losing a war, it’s a tough decision. In some ways, the battles themselves are secondary to the character study of Patton.

Also worth noting is the award-winning screenplay co-written by an up-and-coming Francis Ford Coppola, as well as Jerry Goldsmith’s impressive war appropriate score. The Main Theme gives you a taste of the soundtrack.

Won 7 Academy Awards, Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Director, Best Writing, Best Art Direction, Best Sound and Best Film Editing.

In 1986, George C Scott reprised his role in a made-for-TV sequel, The Last Days of Patton. The movie was based on Patton's final weeks after being mortally injured in a car accident, with flashbacks of Patton's life.


Agree or disagree? Have you seen Patton (1970)? As always, comments are welcome 

10 comments:

  1. I like the ethics and discussion of this movie more than I like the movie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @assholeswatchingmovies: Patton is a long movie to sit through, I admit I watched it in several installments. Does raise interesting questions about authority

      Delete
  2. I think this is one of the finest films about war and I love George C. Scott's performance in that film. Especially in how he brings a lot of nuance to Patton and how even his enemies seem to admire him. I loved that scene where he slapped a crying soldier, it plays into the reality of war. It's like "Goddammit man! You want to go home? Then fight! Fight to get your ass back home! We lose, there is no home to go to! There is no home if you don't stop fighting you sorry sack of shit!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @thevoid99: A great biopic, well-acted, and an important war film. A key scene you highlighted, which I think has more power than the actual battle scenes.I also appreciated how we saw things from the enemy perspective and the Germans were even portrayed as brainy in figuring out how Patton's mind worked.

      Delete
  3. This is one of those movies I've never seen...don't know I'd be interested in it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Nostra: I guess my review didn’t manage to persuade you then!

      Delete
  4. Since 1940's WWII movies were basically government war propaganda, I suspect this 1970 film was groundbreaking in many ways, even if its exploration of tough questions isn't as nuanced as most of us would like it to be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Stephanie: I found the dialogue a tad heavy-handed, but it’s definitely a fine character study, which paved the way for other introspective war films in the years that followed.

      Delete
  5. I haven't seen it in years, but I remember loving Scott's performance and agreeing the film was overlong. I should revisit it some time, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Josh: Yeah, was a tad overlong. George C. Scott really elevated the movie with his performance.

      Delete

What do you think about the post? I look forward to hearing from you. Rest assured I will reply soon.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails